The other major problem with the Zytel mags was that the seam along the back of the mag would split after being filled to capacity. The major problem with the zytel mags was that the feed lips would bend or break, causing reliability problems. The Zytel mags have had mixed reviews as far as reliability goes. The SWD M11/9 uses a Zytel or steel magazine whereas the MAC uses steel mags only. Furthermore, the original SWD M11/9 cocking knob is not ergonomically designed as only one finger can fit on the knob for cocking the guns near 20-25 lb bolt pull. Sighting using the SWD M11/9 is made near impossible because the cocking knob interferes with sighting. The MAC-10/9 knob is also slotted on the top, so that you can actually aim the gun using the peep sight. The cocking knob on the MAC-10/9 also acts as a safety, because turning it 90 degrees will lock the bolt in the forward position. The SWD M11/9 uses a different cocking knob (flat round knob) than the MAC-10/9 (smaller around, but taller). The thinner gauge of metal on the SWD M11/9 has not proven itself a disadvantage as far as durability goes, at least in my case, as I have put thousands of rounds in my SWD M11/9 with no appreciable signs of wear or stress. In fact, discretionary briefcases were made for these two guns, which allows the operator to fire the weapon from inside of the briefcase without removing the weapon. My feeling is that this makes the SWD M11/9 easier to conceal, and is especially true for its.

While the MAC-10 is a light weapon, the SWD M11/9 is even lighter. The big reason for the difference was not so much the cost but the weight. The SWD M11/9 is made of a thinner gauge of sheet metal compared to the MAC-10/9. There are seven distinguishing differences between the SWD M11/9 and the MAC-10/9, and they are as follows: This table is by no means intended to be a comprehensive review of all of the manufacturers and models. Table 1: The different models of SMG and open bolt MAC-type guns produced by various manufactures. *SWD purchased frames from MAC, Stephensville, TX (Leatherwood) and built them up using RPB and Cobray manufactured parts. Rather, this short narrative is intended to give the MAC enthusiast a feel for the differences and similarities between the two most popular transferable SMGs ever built. That topic would be better dealt with in a comprehensive book on this subject. In no way am I claiming that this is an all-inclusive list of all the information on MACs. This question is usually meant to be, 'What is the difference between a MAC-10/9 and a SWD M11/9?' Since I currently own examples of these weapons, I took the time to write down the differences and do a little research on the history and development of the guns and the companies that built them. The most common question (which is really a mistake) is what is the difference between a MAC-10 and a MAC-11 in 9 mm.ДЇor those of you who are into MACs, you know that the MAC-11 is the. However, because his company and others produced a number of clones of his original weapon, a number of different questions have evolved over models and design features. His theories are now axioms, as the MAC has become almost notoriously known as the most reliable sub-machine gun ever built. He also believed in the philosophy that the fewer the working parts, the less that things can break. His M10, in the early 1970s, embodied the spirit of making things smaller, more compact, and less expensive. 45ACP at his Powder Springs Georgia plant, little did he know that this design would be one that would captivate a number of different types of machine gun enthusiasts. Ingram first designed his M10 in 9mm and. A Comparison Of The Military Armament Corporation Model 10/9mm (MAC-10/9) And The Sylvia And Wayne Daniels M11 (SWD M11/9) and other MAC-type weapons.

Google mac 11 lage upper for sale